A REVIEW OF THE JUDICIAL
AND ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSE TO PIRACY AND COUNTERFEITING
.
by DR. BANKOLE SODIPO
(Ph.D. London)
at the seminar on
THE RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
ION THE REGULATION OF FOREIGN
INVESTMENTS AND
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN NIGERIA
held at
The George Washington
University Law School
Washington DC. USA
on Thursday May 16, 2002
Chair: Hon. Marybeth
Peters
US Copyright Register
and Deputy Librarian of Congress
NIGERIA'S JUDICIAL SYSTEM
Supreme Court
I
Court of Appeal
I
State High Courts vs.
Federal High Court - Sharia Court of Appeal
I
Magistrate Courts-
Sharia Courts
Traditions of the
English Common Law
INDEPENDENCE OF THE
JUDICIARY -
confirmed
- Increasing
boldness in the pronouncement of courts - Supreme Court downwards
- increased
confidence of the investing public to challenge the government
- Federal
Government & Non-littoral states vs. Littoral States
- Electoral
Act case
- Property
taxes by Lagos State
- TV Africa
vs. Nigerian Broadcasting Commission
CORRUPTION & FRAUD
Strong Signals against
corruption
The Anti-Corruption
Commission - prosecution of offenders
Resignation of Judges
and State Commissioners
419 - Advanced Fee Fraud
- prosecution of offenders
419 " need for stronger
measures - international cooperation in digital age
COPYRIGHT
1st copyright statute in
Nigeria -1911 English Copyright Act in 1912
- Applicable law today
- Copyright Act 1988
- Treaties - Berne, UCC,
Rome and TRIPS
- Acknowledged by the
IIPA in 1989 to be a good law
- Nigerian courts have
confirmed the following copyright principles among others:
1. Ownership of copyright in a work is different from ownership of
the work
2. The copyright
in architectural drawings can prevent the construction of another building
3. Employees may
own copyright in a work unless there is a written contract to the contrary
4. Foreign works from treaty listed countries are protected
5. Books,
software, music, sound recordings, films, artistic works, broadcasts are
protected
6. Serialization is an infringement - it is not the same thing as a
book review
7. Pirates can be sued in their business name
TRADEMARKS
- 1st
Trademark statute, Trademarks Ordinance of 1901 - 2nd, the 1914 Trademarks
Ordinance
- Applicable
law today - Trademarks Act, 1965
- Judgments on
trademarks and passing off have been handed down in Nigeria since 1903
- Since 1912,
Nigerian courts had affirmed that, the function of trademark was for
"protecting not only a vast illiterate
population little acquainted with pictorial representations, but also the
pioneers of trade who have earned a reputation among these illiterate folk
by the quality of goods associated with some recognised mark such as a
particular bird, animal, tree or other object".
- Trap Orders
are allowed
- Distributors
of counterfeit products liable
- Ignorance is
no excuse
- SOME
CASES
- VIAGRA
- COLGATE
- TEXACO
ADMINISTRATIVE PROBLEMS
WITH TRADEMARKS
- Trademarks
Registry - lack of independence - budgetary constraints
- Proposed
Intellectual Property Commission
- Trademarks
Journal
- Trademarks
Opposition Hearing
- Effect of
Administrative Problems
- Acceptance
Forms formerly treated as registration
PATENTS AND DESIGNS
- 1st Patents
statute - Registration of UK Patents Ordinance, 1925
- Applicable
law - 1970 Patents and Designs Act
- Formal
examination - 20 years term
- Little
litigation
- Rights have
been enforced where owners prove their case
CRIMINAL SANCTIONS AND
BORDER CONTROL
- The
Counterfeit and Fake Drugs Act, 1989
- The Trade
Malpractices (Miscellaneous Offences) Decree, 1992
- A Consumer
Protection Council by the Consumer Protection Council Decree, 1992
- Nigerian
Copyright Commission - Copyright Inspectors with powers to arrest and
prosecute
- NAFDAC -
powers to arrest and prosecute offenders for counterfeit food and drugs
- New rules
for Border Control by NAFDAC and Copyright commission
- Absence of
border control rules for general trademarks
LEVEL OF COUNTERFEITING
- RESPONSE OF OWNERS
- change of
packaging - Fold arms - Weak strategy
REMEDIES AGAINST
COUNTERFEITING AND PIRACY
- Injunctions
- ex parte
- Anton Filler
type inspection and seizure orders
- Why some
have failed in obtaining or enforcing the orders
- Class
actions - the developments |